OCU activation

How is this. Now that you have proven me wrong about your designs and aircraft. I apologise for discrediting your work. In fact, I accpet that you feel that I have bashed your work, and am not looking for forgiveness. I have shamed and insaulted your work recently, and you personally when we met. I can't excuse myself, for I have wronged you, and no longer will discredit your work. I am rather impressed by your work and art, and respect that you are staying true to the logical aspect of the VR-World. There is no technology race, and the picture of the craft is not one I created, as I said, it is that which was made by SkyKid, whom is not as active anymore due to work and school, much like me. However, I did put together all of those sceneries.

One day, when I get my shit together, I would like to help finnish his model, and ut it into FSX. I will not accept credit for his work, since he started it. I agree that I might have come across imature toward your work, and also apologies for that. I think I will just stick to the VR-World stuff, and no longer comment negitavely on your hard work. You have proven me wrong, and I commend you for it. I also will take your reverse bashing as constructive criticizm, and work toward correcting myself. After all, without recognizing what others see in you, one can't evolve to become a better being. You can do what you want with my apology, and I will regret what I have said, where it is not right.

"After all, without recognizing what others see in you, one can't evolve to become a better being." I totally agree. Especially for those of us who hold a leadership position. Apology accepted.

Oh, and by the way. I have added your groups forum areas to the site. The areas are given administrator rights to the profiles matched with the proper company and unit names. Like I said before, there is a way to put a picture for the area, I think. You know, like it is for the GPEO ribbons on teh GPEO forum, I think it can be done here, also. You can communicate through those areas, rather then a single thread. I felt that it was better for you to have your own seperate areas.

We appreciate that Dragnoxz. Thanks.

Not really. The "we" part I mean. FB-22 looks SICK!!! You said to take off the trust vectors though? Can I ask the logic behind that?

Because it's bomber. You're not going to use it for air superiority missions. You can arm it to take out air targets on the way to the target, just like the F-15E Strike Eagle. But this thing is designed to get really high, and really fast. Get to the target undetected, drop it's payload, and split just as fast as it came in. For this purpose, we don't need the Trust Vectors, or even the stabilizers for that matter. No stabs means no drag. That means higher speed and better fuel efficiency. Even with these aerodynamic alterations the Strike Raptor will still be have the capabilities of at least the F-15. The extended delta wing will cause it to bleed speed in high g turns, but again, its not a dogfighter. That's what the F-22C is for.

Oooohhhhh. Okay. I get you. Speaking of which. You want me to upload the missile test video from the F-22C?

Not yet. Use the F-18HARV. The avionics in the F-22C are all custom built and I don't want anybody seeing the cockpit but IDN personnel until we release it to the public. That shit's classified.

OOOOHHH creepy! Okay, I'll put up the AMRAAM video fromt the HARV then.

Oh yeah! I forgot to tell you earlier. I gave the nose cone of the FB-22 and F-22C animations. If you hit ctrl+e 4 the nose cone opens to the right, like on a door hinge. And you can see the AESA radar.

You're so clever. Good idea!....too bad Jenny did that last year with the F-16E.

We have to hurry up with our Insertion/Evac selection for SOD-1

SOD-1 chose the UH-1Y and Ch-46 for troop insertion and the AH-1Z as interim escort gunship. Once AST has finished the RAH-66, SOD-1 will upgrade and the AH-1Zs will be auctioned to IDN personnel.